International cooperation as a “global public good”
Published on Tue, 2011-11-22 09:28
International development cooperation “is and must be regarded as a global public good” and with full participation of the civil society, according with the contribution of a thousand Latin American and Caribbean organizations to the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness that will be held next week in Busan, South Korea.
The statement of the civil society organizations reads as follows:
Our core target as a region
The civil society organizations of Latin America and the Caribbean have discussed how to improve the international development cooperation effectiveness in relation to the agenda of the 4th High Level Forum (HLF-4) that will be held in South Korea.
We have consolidated a series of regional political targets that are complemented and cemented with those of every country. As such, our 5 core proposals state that:
1. International development cooperation is and must be regarded as a global public good, devoted to contribute to funding development, to realize every individual’s human rights, and to overcome inequalities and any other forms of exclusion.
2. Civil society organizations are both social actors with regards to development, and political actors in the processes that deepen and strengthen democracy in our societies. When appropriate conditions in the environment are present, our actions contribute by enriching the public agenda, as well as empowering social groups claiming for their rights and also as watchdogs of public goods including international development cooperations as well as sustainability of ongoing processes.
3. Not only must cooperation with middle income countries continue, but also change by recognizing that poverty, inequality and exclusion —wherever they exist— are problems that concern all mankind as a whole and hence, the international development cooperations system.
4. Strengthening civil society organizations must be a core target for any development process and international development cooperation itself. Primarily, any successful agreement on development-oriented projects or actions for a specific territory must include the reinforcement of the organizational structures of such territory.
5. Attention to gender equality and women’s rights, including the enhancement of their organizations and networks, has generated general consensus among regional civil society organizations, and it represents a major priority. This is a message not only to public actors, but also to international development cooperation and civil society organizations themselves.
Our messages to other stakeholders of cooperation
Based on our discussions, Latin America and the Caribbean civil society organizations convene the following stakeholders to consider and address these recommendations:
To official development cooperation
-- Also, comply with the provisions of the Paris Declaration and the Accra Agenda for Action.
-- Design novel mechanisms for cooperation with middle income countries. Its particular inequality has made traditional cooperation little advisable. However, international development cooperation must not disappear, but be reoriented Maintain both in writing as well as in practice, action taken in Accra where civil society organizations are recognized as actors that are fully entitled in development processes, and therefore guarantee a place for civil society organizations participation and establish effective political communication.
-- Transform the perspective of “security” as the core value in the various cooperation agendas. Inequality and exclusion are also forms of violence.
-- Include as a priority and effectiveness criterion the reinforcement of local institutionality and civil society organizations located in territories where programs or projects are being executed with support of international cooperation.
-- Bear in mind that cooperation is directed towards states and societies rather than governments. Cooperating only with countries with common ideological and political affinities, and letting aside civil societies are inappropriate practices that move away from seeing cooperation as a public good.
-- Assume more strict transparency criteria and standards in order to facilitate social audit processes and project assessment since society looks forward to guaranteeing that resources are invested as properly and efficiently as possible.
-- To enhance both local and national levels by using national systems and/or strengthening the current ones where financial, technical, knowledge and human talent flows occur when carrying out development projects. Unilateral conditions must be eliminated. In contrast, advancing towards mutual recognition of international frameworks concerning human rights, decent work, “action without harm”, women’s rights, children’s rights and protection of minorities, is key to developing cooperation projects.
-- In Latin America and the Caribbean it is vital to integrate both local and regional governments as legitimate interlocutors of international cooperation, either for decentralized cooperation agreements and triangular South-South cooperation.
-- Guarantee sustainability in the technical, financial, environmental and social arenas for development projects. Every actor must demand and question itself and other actors on how they are addressing this matter. As well, such sustainability must constitute a principle of effectiveness.
-- Be completely acquainted with the differences between private investment and cooperation. Profitable investment is regulated in every country; however, it must also be included and complied with in frameworks claiming for human rights, decent work, and environmental sustainability.
To national governments of Latin America and the Caribbean
-- Create permanent institutional spaces for tripartite discussions (States, international cooperation and civil society organizations) about international development cooperation issues, in order to enrich the agenda and agree development priorities.
-- Recognize the Istambul principles as a reference framework for cooperation and relationships with civil society organizations and adhere to the commitments subscribed in the Accra Agenda for Action including the creation of enabling environment for the civil society organizations’ development. The entire region needs that explicitly and publicly the highest levels of government recognize that organizations of the society are legitimate spaces that look after the public interest.
-- Use public funding mechanisms for deepening work relations with civil society organizations, maximizing the faculties of these organizations for the production of public goods through the services and processes they promote.
-- Develop long term public policies for international development cooperation at the state level and also promote them all over local and subnational territories, allowing commitment and participation of all stakeholders involved in development. international development cooperation using a short-term approach is highly disruptive.
-- Create public information systems on programs and projects currently designed and executed in different countries in order to promote transparency with regards to allocation and use of public resources aimed at carrying out development projects.
-- Manage South-South cooperation in terms of transparency, mutual accountability and citizen engagement so as to avoid repeated failures that traditional cooperation has been recognizing and correcting.
-- Create a new institutionality in Latin America and worldwide, acknowledging new realities and generating governance and control mechanisms for international financial flows.
To local and regional governments
-- Incorporate civil society organizations (local, community, territorial) in the design, operation and evaluation of geographically specific projects taking account citizenship needs.
-- Act under criteria of maximum transparency and accountability that guarantee citizen engagement using democratic mechanisms of public information and follow-up.
-- Give continuity to development projects that have delivered good results. Territorial civil society organizations usually have cumulative knowledge and memory in terms of what has worked well.
-- Build cooperation projects in border areas with the purpose of gathering mutual energies and synergies to solve problems regarding poverty and exclusion, and to advance towards a closer regional integration according to peoples’ needs.
To private cooperation
-- From Latin America and the Caribbean we call for “responsive cooperation” to provide our agenda with a new “political approach” without reducing our role as mere project operators, contractors or subcontractors. It is urgent to resume central discussions such as the international system necessary to advance towards a more fair and sustainable society.
-- The new modes of cooperation such as South-South cooperation, triangular cooperation and decentralized cooperation require systematizing practices and build knowledge based on experience. Programs with a global reach for such purposes are urgent at present.
To the private sector
-- Donations coming from this sector are also public goods and must assume responsibilities regarding transparency and accountability, as in the case of other actors of cooperation.
-- A strengthened civil society is a public good that is beneficial to all.
To legislative and other branches of national states
To other stakeholders
-- Civil society organizations must develop and implement fully the Istanbul Principles.
-- They must recognize that there are different levels of institutional strengthening and also difficulties to observe each principle, and generate appropriate strategies accordingly. Access to international cooperation requires mutual support.
-- They must understand that civil society organizations are not free of patriarchal practices within them. As well, the women’s rights agenda must be a core issue to strengthen such organizations, and must be accompanied by respect and recognition of women’s and feminist organizations and their agendas.
-- Not all the sources of founding are legitimate, especially if they do not respect agreements on human rights. It is better to say NO to those funding entities rather than facing unethical consequences due to the said entities’ nature or origin.
The group of civil society organizations that has been involved in these discussions has had an intense and long way to go. It has been an absolutely valuable experience to collectively and progressively generate not only knowledge but also agreements. Our next step is to use all this work as training and mobilization guidelines in order to advance towards our core objective: to fulfill the conditions for a “good life” for everyone in our world.
Busan, South Korea, November 2011