{"id":1213,"date":"2017-07-07T21:31:00","date_gmt":"2017-07-07T21:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/?p=1213"},"modified":"2025-11-11T21:33:54","modified_gmt":"2025-11-11T21:33:54","slug":"sarada-pokracuje","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/2017\/07\/sarada-pokracuje\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0160ar\u00e1da pokra\u010duje"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Tato slova zazn\u00edvaj\u00ed v jedn\u00e9 v\u00fdrazn\u00e9 sc\u00e9n\u011b jednoho proslul\u00e9ho normaliza\u010dn\u00edho propagandistick\u00e9ho seri\u00e1lu (lze p\u0159itom jen doporu\u010dit jist\u00e9 kreativn\u00ed vyu\u017eit\u00ed t\u00e9to sc\u00e9ny<\/a>...). Kontext je v\u00fdrazn\u011b odli\u0161n\u00fd, ale \u00fazce vzato to sed\u00ed. Mus\u00edm se toti\u017e znovu vr\u00e1tit ke sv\u00fdm dv\u011bma text\u016fm \u201eTer\u010dem je rodina<\/a>\u201c (KONZERVATIVN\u00cd LISTY, \u00fanor 2016) a \u201ePohrd\u00e1n\u00ed skute\u010dn\u011b zn\u00e1siln\u011bn\u00fdmi<\/a>\u201c (KONZERVATIVN\u00cd LISTY, listopad 2016), proto\u017ee st\u00e1le nar\u016fst\u00e1 kvantita st\u00e1le stejn\u011b (ne)kvalitn\u00edch sd\u011blen\u00ed... proto\u017ee prost\u011b \u0161ar\u00e1da pokra\u010duje \u2013 a t\u011b\u017eko se \u010dlov\u011bk br\u00e1n\u00ed poku\u0161en\u00ed myslet si, \u017ee je to jasn\u00e1 p\u0159ev\u00fdchovn\u00e1 kampa\u0148: ty chlapy je zkr\u00e1tka pot\u0159eba po\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b sk\u0159\u00edpnout a jednou z nejlep\u0161\u00edch cest, jak to prov\u00e9st, je v\u0161t\u00edpit jim nejprve permanentn\u00ed pocit mor\u00e1ln\u00ed pod\u0159adnosti (podobn\u00fd stud, jak\u00fd m\u00e1me spr\u00e1vn\u011b c\u00edtit v\u0161ichni, kte\u0159\u00ed jsme se narodili jako b\u00edl\u00ed... nav\u00edc v bohat\u0161\u00edch zem\u00edch... atd.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

P\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dit spole\u010dnost, \u017ee mu\u017e je vlastn\u011b synonymum pro agresivn\u00ed n\u00e1silnick\u00e9 hovado... a p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dit hlavn\u011b mu\u017ee, \u017ee je tomu tak, to je velice dobr\u00fd zp\u016fsob \u2013 pr\u00e1v\u011b ti eticky citliv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u00e1nov\u00e9 se budou preventivn\u011b k\u00e1t, a ty, kte\u0159\u00ed to odm\u00edtnou, zmas\u00edrovan\u00e1 spole\u010dnost odsoud\u00ed. Nechci se p\u0159itom pou\u0161t\u011bt do spekulac\u00ed, jak\u00fd vliv m\u016f\u017ee takov\u00e1 kampa\u0148 m\u00edt na skute\u010dn\u00e9 n\u00e1siln\u00edky, resp. zda m\u016f\u017ee sn\u00ed\u017eit pravd\u011bpodobnost, \u017ee \u010dlov\u011bk s p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00fdmi sklony potla\u010d\u00ed sv\u00e9 n\u00e1siln\u00e9 choutky \u2013 to bych r\u00e1d p\u0159enechal odborn\u00edk\u016fm (a mysl\u00edm t\u00edm rozhodn\u011b sp\u00ed\u0161e psychology ne\u017e absolventy gender studies...). Nepop\u00edr\u00e1m v\u00fdznam prevence, jen bych se velmi divil, kdyby se nepoda\u0159ilo, p\u0159i tro\u0161e snahy, nal\u00e9zt takov\u00fd zp\u016fsob, kter\u00fd by se z\u00e1rove\u0148 nesna\u017eil stigmatizovat prakticky celou dosp\u011blou mu\u017eskou populaci. Tohle bud\u00ed dojem, \u017ee o tu stigmatizaci jde p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, na argumentaci uveden\u00e9 ve zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdch textech nemus\u00edm m\u011bnit ani slovo \u2013 nezaznamenal jsem nic, co by k tomu m\u011blo v\u00e9st. Ale k t\u011bm v\u00fdzkum\u016fm, kter\u00e9 jsem citoval ve druh\u00e9m textu, tedy p\u0159ibyl dal\u0161\u00ed materi\u00e1l! Tentokr\u00e1t v n\u011bm m\u00e1 prsty \u010desk\u00e1 koalice mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b Social Watch a jedn\u00e1 se o v\u00fdro\u010dn\u00ed zpr\u00e1vu o rovnosti pohlav\u00ed<\/a>. \u010ceskou koalici Social Watch nyn\u00ed tvo\u0159\u00ed sedm organizac\u00ed: Ekumenick\u00e1 akademie, F\u00f3rum 50 %, Educon, Nesehnut\u00ed, Alternativa Zdola, Eurosolar a Adeptts. \u010cerp\u00e1m tak\u00e9 z textu \u201e\u017deny jsou v\u00edce ohro\u017eeny chudobou. P\u0159es milion jich za\u017eilo dom\u00e1c\u00ed n\u00e1sil\u00ed<\/a>\u201c (iDnes.cz, 7. b\u0159ezna 2017). Jedno z hlavn\u00edch sd\u011blen\u00ed uveden\u00fdch i v tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku \u2013 alarmuj\u00edc\u00ed sd\u011blen\u00ed, jak jinak \u2013 pak zn\u00ed takto: \u201eV\u00fdzkumy uk\u00e1zaly, \u017ee v \u017eivot\u011b m\u011blo s dom\u00e1c\u00edm n\u00e1sil\u00edm zku\u0161enost 28 procent \u017een nad 18 let. P\u0159i p\u0159epo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1n\u00ed na po\u010det obyvatel to p\u0159edstavuje 1,2 milionu \u017een, zd\u016fraznil autorsk\u00fd t\u00fdm.\u201c Jak jsem ji\u017e napsal d\u0159\u00edve, jsem dalek toho bagatelizovat skute\u010dn\u00e9 dom\u00e1c\u00ed n\u00e1sil\u00ed nebo dokonce zn\u00e1siln\u011bn\u00ed a pardonovat re\u00e1ln\u00e9 n\u00e1siln\u00edky. Jsem v\u0161ak p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den, \u017ee t\u00edmto p\u0159eh\u00e1n\u011bn\u00edm se opravdov\u00fdm ob\u011btem d\u011bl\u00e1 medv\u011bd\u00ed slu\u017eba \u2013 t\u00edm, co je takto bagatelizov\u00e1no, je toti\u017e jejich utrpen\u00ed. Nechci se v\u0161ak opakovat, a proto u\u017e jen dopln\u00edm hlavn\u00ed d\u016fvod m\u00e9 skepse stran v\u011brohodnosti presentovan\u00fdch \u00fadaj\u016f: definice... tedy p\u0159esn\u011bji pochybn\u00e9 definice, kdy (no a u\u017e se opakuji, omlouv\u00e1m se...) n\u011bkter\u00e9 feministick\u00e9 autorky pova\u017euj\u00ed za zn\u00e1siln\u011bn\u00ed i situaci, kdy \u017eena \u201ekopuluje proto, aby byl doma klid\u201c. Ono kdy\u017e se k takov\u00e9mu pr\u016fzkumu p\u0159istoup\u00ed s n\u00e1le\u017eitou p\u0159edpojatost\u00ed, m\u016f\u017ee to vypadat, jako kdy\u017e sir Humphrey n\u00e1zorn\u011b p\u0159edv\u00e1d\u00ed Bernardovi, jak snadno lze z\u00edskat podporu pro i proti z\u00e1m\u011bru obnovit presen\u010dn\u00ed vojenskou slu\u017ebu... (Jist\u011b pane premi\u00e9re, nem\u00fdl\u00edm-li se epizoda Velk\u00fd pl\u00e1n).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Uvedn\u00e1 v\u00fdro\u010dn\u00ed zpr\u00e1va v\u0161ak m\u00e1 je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159idanou hodnotu. Citujme op\u011bt zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek: \u201eKoalice Social Watch ve zpr\u00e1v\u011b poukazuje na to, \u017ee chudoba hroz\u00ed v\u00edc ne\u00fapln\u00fdm rodin\u00e1m. V jejich \u010dele stoj\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inou \u017eeny. \u201aS\u00f3lo matky tvo\u0159\u00ed podle s\u010d\u00edt\u00e1n\u00ed lidu 87 procent v\u0161ech s\u00f3lo rodi\u010d\u016f v \u010cesku\u2018, uv\u00e1d\u00ed zpr\u00e1va.\u201c A d\u00e1le: \u201eV \u010cesku je chudobou ohro\u017eeno tak\u00e9 mnohem v\u00edce seniorek ne\u017e senior\u016f. Chudoba hrozila p\u011btin\u011b \u017een nad 65 let a dev\u00edti procent\u016fm stejn\u011b star\u00fdch mu\u017e\u016f, uv\u00e1d\u00ed koalice ve zpr\u00e1v\u011b. \u017deny toti\u017e maj\u00ed kv\u016fli sv\u00fdm ni\u017e\u0161\u00edm v\u00fdd\u011blk\u016fm tak\u00e9 pr\u016fm\u011brn\u011b zhruba o p\u011btinu ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed penze. Nejhor\u0161\u00ed je situace t\u011bch, kter\u00e9 ve st\u00e1\u0159\u00ed z\u016fstaly samy.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Skute\u010dnosti, \u017ee v \u010dele chudobou v\u00edce ohro\u017een\u00fdch ne\u00fapln\u00fdch rodin stoj\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inou \u017eeny, lze celkem snadno odpomoct: p\u0159edch\u00e1zejme rozvod\u016fm, nap\u0159. umo\u017en\u011bn\u00edm uzav\u0159en\u00ed civiln\u00edho s\u0148atku bez mo\u017enosti rozvodu (m\u011bjme na pam\u011bti, \u017ee p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinou rozvodu \u010dasto b\u00fdv\u00e1 nerozv\u00e1\u017en\u011b uzav\u0159en\u00fd s\u0148atek...), nebo mo\u017enost\u00ed soud\u016f rozhodnout, kter\u00fd z man\u017eelsk\u00e9ho p\u00e1ru nese za rozvod vinu (se samo\u0159ejm\u00fdm d\u016fsledkem sv\u011b\u0159en\u00ed spole\u010dn\u00fdch d\u011bt\u00ed do p\u00e9\u010de tomu druh\u00e9mu z nich), a kdy\u017e u\u017e k rozvodu za st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edch podm\u00ednek tedy dojde, nech\u0165 soudy ukon\u010d\u00ed diskriminaci otc\u016f a sv\u011b\u0159uj\u00ed jim podstatn\u011b \u010dast\u011bji d\u011bti do p\u00e9\u010de... D\u00e1v\u00e1m to jako n\u00e1m\u011bt pro koalici Social Watch \u2013 nepochybuji, \u017ee m\u00e1 k lobov\u00e1n\u00ed k disposici mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed know how (v\u017edy\u0165 jde o mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed s\u00ed\u0165!) i slu\u0161nou praxi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Co se chudobou ohro\u017een\u011bj\u0161\u00edch seniorek t\u00fdk\u00e1, opravdu nev\u00edm, co d\u011blat. \u017de jeden s\u00e1m je ohro\u017een chudobou v\u00edce ne\u017e ten, kdo \u017eije v p\u00e1ru, to je prost\u011b fakt \u2013 platn\u00fd shodn\u011b pro mu\u017ee jako pro \u017eeny (viz nap\u0159. \u017divotn\u00ed podm\u00ednky senior\u016f v \u010cesku a v Evrop\u011b (SILC) \u2013 2015<\/a>, \u010cS\u00da). No a mu\u017ei prost\u011b um\u00edraj\u00ed d\u0159\u00edve (nav\u00edc je \u010detn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy je v man\u017eelsk\u00e9m p\u00e1ru mu\u017e t\u00edm star\u0161\u00edm...) a tak ti \u017eenat\u00ed mu\u017ei, kte\u0159\u00ed p\u0159e\u017eili sv\u00e9 65. narozeniny, maj\u00ed s v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed pravd\u011bpodobnost\u00ed na \u017eivu man\u017eelku (a t\u00edm p\u00e1dem jsou, coby \u017eij\u00edc\u00ed v p\u00e1ru, m\u00e9n\u011b ohro\u017eeni chudobou), ne\u017e \u017ee vdan\u00e1 \u017eena star\u0161\u00ed 65 let m\u00e1 na \u017eivu man\u017eela. V ka\u017ed\u00e9 kohort\u011b je zkr\u00e1tka v\u00edce vdov ne\u017e vdovc\u016f \u2013 to je prost\u011b demografie... Skoro bych se vsadil, \u017ee po odfiltrov\u00e1n\u00ed tohoto vlivu budou sice st\u00e1le (i z uveden\u00e9ho d\u016fvodu rozd\u00edlu ve v\u00fd\u0161i penz\u00ed) t\u011bmi chudobou ohro\u017een\u011bj\u0161\u00edmi seniorky, ale rozd\u00edl mezi nimi a seniory nebude zdaleka tak v\u00fdrazn\u00fd (20 % vs. 9 %). V\u017edy\u0165 princip z\u00e1sluhovosti se do dnes vypl\u00e1cen\u00fdch penz\u00ed prom\u00edt\u00e1 st\u00e1le tak slab\u011b! \u010cili ten, kdo pob\u00edral celo\u017eivotn\u011b n\u00e1sobn\u011b v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed plat ne\u017e n\u011bkdo jin\u00fd, m\u00e1 d\u016fchod jen o n\u011bco vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed... To v\u0161e ukazuje, \u017ee dominantn\u00ed p\u0159\u00ed\u010dina jevu, kter\u00fd se sna\u017e\u00ed koalice Social Watch nasv\u00edtit, bude spo\u010d\u00edvat v t\u00e9 demografii.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ostatn\u011b, citujme zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fd materi\u00e1l \u010cS\u00da (\u010d\u00e1st 3, \u201ePorovn\u00e1n\u00ed prvn\u00ed a druh\u00e9 hranice chudoby v roce 2014 v \u010cesk\u00e9 republice (60 % a 70 % medi\u00e1nov\u00e9ho ekvivalizovan\u00e9ho disponibiln\u00edho p\u0159\u00edjmu)\u201c): \u201eTato situace (\u017eivot pod hranic\u00ed chudoby, pozn. J.K.) se t\u00fdk\u00e1 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm osam\u011ble \u017eij\u00edc\u00edch \u017een, vdov, d\u016fchodky\u0148. \u017deny jsou v\u011bt\u0161inou mlad\u0161\u00ed v partnersk\u00e9m p\u00e1ru ne\u017e mu\u017ei, jejich pracovn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edjmy b\u00fdvaj\u00ed ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed a do\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed se vy\u0161\u0161\u00edho v\u011bku ne\u017e mu\u017ei. Pokud jim zem\u0159e partner nebo jsou rozveden\u00e9, jsou \u010dasto z\u00e1visl\u00e9 jen na jednom p\u0159\u00edjmu, v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b to b\u00fdv\u00e1 starobn\u00ed d\u016fchod a ten neb\u00fdv\u00e1 nijak vysok\u00fd. Ani vdovsk\u00fd d\u016fchod po man\u017eelovi \u017een\u011b nez\u016fstane v pln\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161i, ale je v\u00fdznamn\u011b kr\u00e1cen.\u201c Nen\u00ed nic origin\u00e1ln\u00edho na pozn\u00e1mce, \u017ee nejlep\u0161\u00edm d\u016fchodov\u00fdm zabezpe\u010den\u00edm jsou v kone\u010dn\u00e9m d\u016fsledku dob\u0159e vychovan\u00e9 d\u011bti. To je prost\u011b fakt (platn\u00fd navzrody tomu, \u017ee n\u00e1\u0161 st\u00e1t dlouhodob\u011b toleruje situaci, kdy jsou chudobou ohro\u017eeny pr\u00e1v\u011b rodiny s v\u00edce d\u011btmi). Dalo by se d\u00e1le \u0159\u00edct, \u017ee presentace dan\u00e9ho probl\u00e9mu jako prim\u00e1rn\u00edho je variac\u00ed na (\u00fadajn\u011b) Churchillovo \u201eKapitalismu je vlastn\u00ed jedna vada: nerovnom\u011brn\u00e9 rozd\u011blen\u00ed bohatstv\u00ed. Socialismu je vlastn\u00ed naproti tomu jedna ctnost: rovnom\u011brn\u00e9 rozd\u011blen\u00ed b\u00eddy.\u201c. Generace Hus\u00e1kov\u00fdch d\u011bt\u00ed, kter\u00e1 dnes mezi produktivn\u00ed populac\u00ed jasn\u011b po\u010detn\u011b dominanuje, prakticky nem\u016f\u017ee po\u010d\u00edtat s \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fdm d\u016fchodem, kter\u00fd by byl vypl\u00e1cen st\u00e1tem. U\u017e d\u00e1vno jsem p\u0159estal ps\u00e1t, pro\u010d tomu tak je, ale nen\u00ed probl\u00e9m naj\u00edt n\u011bco \u010derstv\u00e9ho<\/a>. M\u00edsto abychom si kladli ot\u00e1zku, jak dosp\u011bt do stavu, kdy vypl\u00e1cen\u00e9 d\u016fchody umo\u017en\u00ed jejich p\u0159\u00edjemc\u016fm materi\u00e1ln\u011b bohat\u0161\u00ed \u017eivot, budeme baz\u00edrovat na tom, aby z toho celkov\u00e9ho m\u00e1la nem\u011bl n\u00e1hodou n\u011bkdo v\u00edc. Kdy\u017e v\u00e1m d\u00e1 n\u011bkdo na v\u00fdb\u011br mezi t\u00edm, \u017ee \u017eeny i mu\u017ei maj\u00ed pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00fd d\u016fchod 12 000 K\u010d, a situac\u00ed, kdy \u017eeny maj\u00ed pr\u016fm\u011brn\u011b 13 000 K\u010d a mu\u017ei 14 000 K\u010d (nebo klidn\u011b naopak), kterou z obou situac\u00ed berete? Troufnu si \u0159\u00edct, \u017ee jde-li v\u00e1m v\u00e1\u017en\u011b o v\u011bc, pak tu druhou, ale jste-li ideolog... Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, nem\u011bl bych nic proti tomu, aby po \u00famrt\u00ed jednoho z man\u017eel\u016f, za n\u011bjak\u00fdch stanoven\u00fdch podm\u00ednek (nap\u0159. pokud ji\u017e oba pob\u00edrali starobn\u00ed d\u016fchod), z\u016fstal vdov\u011b \u010di vdovci ten vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed z obou d\u016fchod\u016f \u2013 nem\u00e1m tento n\u00e1pad, p\u0159izn\u00e1v\u00e1m bez mu\u010den\u00ed, podlo\u017een v\u016fbec \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fdmi v\u00fdpo\u010dty, ale h\u00e1d\u00e1m, \u017ee s na\u0161\u00edm pr\u016fb\u011b\u017en\u00fdm penzijn\u00edm syst\u00e9mem, kter\u00fd se aktu\u00e1ln\u011b nach\u00e1z\u00ed ve fat\u00e1ln\u00edch pot\u00ed\u017e\u00edch, by to nic z\u00e1sadn\u00edho neud\u011blalo... Jen\u017ee ani takov\u00e9 opat\u0159en\u00ed by nezm\u011bnilo kritizovanou skute\u010dnost, \u017ee v\u011bt\u0161inu senior\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed \u017eij\u00ed pod hranic\u00ed chudoby, tvo\u0159\u00ed \u017eeny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kone\u010dn\u011b, m\u00e1me zde tedy na jedn\u00e9 stran\u011b standardn\u00ed materi\u00e1l \u010cS\u00da s plnou sadou informac\u00ed a na stran\u011b druh\u00e9 v\u00fdro\u010dn\u00ed zpr\u00e1vu o rovnosti pohlav\u00ed z d\u00edlny \u010desk\u00e9 koalice mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b Social Watch, kter\u00e1 n\u00e1m \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 tot\u00e9\u017e, \u201epouze\u201c jeden podstatn\u00fd aspekt (ten demografick\u00fd) prakticky zaml\u010duje. Kolik to n\u00e1s, da\u0148ov\u00e9 poplatn\u00edky, asi st\u00e1lo pen\u011bz, aby se k n\u00e1m tato kvalitn\u00ed informace dostala? Ale co... to genderov\u00e9 balen\u00ed, to je p\u0159ece k nezaplacen\u00ed...<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Napsal Jan Kubal\u010d\u00edk <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tato slova zazn\u00edvaj\u00ed v jedn\u00e9 v\u00fdrazn\u00e9 sc\u00e9n\u011b jednoho proslul\u00e9ho normaliza\u010dn\u00edho propagandistick\u00e9ho seri\u00e1lu (lze p\u0159itom jen doporu\u010dit jist\u00e9 kreativn\u00ed vyu\u017eit\u00ed t\u00e9to sc\u00e9ny...). Kontext je v\u00fdrazn\u011b odli\u0161n\u00fd, ale \u00fazce vzato to sed\u00ed. Mus\u00edm se toti\u017e znovu vr\u00e1tit ke sv\u00fdm dv\u011bma text\u016fm \u201eTer\u010dem je rodina\u201c (KONZERVATIVN\u00cd LISTY, \u00fanor 2016) a \u201ePohrd\u00e1n\u00ed skute\u010dn\u011b zn\u00e1siln\u011bn\u00fdmi\u201c (KONZERVATIVN\u00cd LISTY, listopad 2016), proto\u017ee st\u00e1le […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1214,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[142,143],"tags":[199],"class_list":["post-1213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-social-watch-news","tag-czech-republic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1213"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1215,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213\/revisions\/1215"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}