{"id":1443,"date":"2001-12-30T19:11:00","date_gmt":"2001-12-30T19:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/2001\/10\/social-watch-annual-report-2001\/"},"modified":"2025-12-08T13:17:11","modified_gmt":"2025-12-08T13:17:11","slug":"social-watch-annual-report-2001","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/2001\/12\/social-watch-annual-report-2001\/","title":{"rendered":"Social Watch Annual Report 2001"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Social Watch 2001<\/strong> emphasises the issue of wealth distribution. Eradication of poverty cannot be achieved in a context of outrageous disparities among and within nations. Social Watch coalitions in 47 countries track the evolution of indicators that measure poverty<\/strong>. The charts show how countries stand on key social indicators and how much progress they have made toward their goals. Two world maps indicate the extent of inequity by showing distribution of the world\u2019s income.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\"documento Table of contents<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Charting progress. Much ado\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n


Measuring progress<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Information poverty<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento About the methodology<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Statistics showing country by country progress toward social development goals  (zip)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Progress and Regressions in the fulfillment of the Copenhagen goals<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Changes in women's situation from 1990<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Changes in social and military expenditure from 1990<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Trends of Official Development Aid<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Table of signatures and ratifications of the treaties from the Millennium Declaration<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Table of signatures and ratifications of other key international agreements<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Table of ratifications of the fundamental ILO Conventions<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n


Thematic Reports<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Liberalisation of financial markets: Is everybody injoying the game?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Just as in Kosovo<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento World Social Forum. Something new was born in Porto Alegre<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento The Cotonou Agreement: a gateway for civil society engagement in development co-operation?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Women, the global economy and decision making<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Peru: civil society conquers a sinister dictatorshiop<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento National machineries for the advancement of women in Africa: Are they transforming gender relations?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento The Cotonou Agreement<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento In the Beijing+5 trenches<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n


Country reports<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Argentina<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Bahrain<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"documento Bangladesh<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Bolivia<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Brazil<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Bulgaria<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Canada<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Chile<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Colombia<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Costa Rica<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Egypt<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" El Salvador<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Ethiopia<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Germany<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Guatemala<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Honduras<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" India<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Indonesia<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Iraq<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Italy<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Kenya<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Korea<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Lebanon<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Malaysia<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Mexico<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Morocco<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Nepal<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Norway<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Palestine<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Panama<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Paraguay<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Peru<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Philippines<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Senegal<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" South Africa<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Spain<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Sri Lanka<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Suriname<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Tanzania<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Thailand<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Uganda<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" United Kingdom<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" United States<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Uruguay<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Venezuela<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Viet Nam<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Zambia<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Sources and Resources<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"PDF\" Acronyms<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Social Watch 2001 emphasises the issue of wealth distribution. Eradication of poverty cannot be achieved in a context of outrageous disparities among and within nations. Social Watch coalitions in 47 countries track the evolution of indicators that measure poverty. The charts show how countries stand on key social indicators and how much progress they have made toward their goals. Two world maps indicate the extent of inequity by showing distribution of the world\u2019s income.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[233,148,149],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-233","category-annual-report","category-publications"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1443"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2383,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1443\/revisions\/2383"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialwatch.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}