Parliamentary Profligacy. fe’s weekly snapshot from busy blogs
Source: . Published on Tue, 2006-08-29 17:21
According to a report prepared by the National Social Watch Coalition, titled ‘Citizens Report on Development and Governance—2006,’ India’s current Parliamentary expenditure is Rs 72 lakh per day. This works out to Rs 20,000 per minute. In 1951, the cost was Rs 100 per minute. If this isn’t stunning enough, there’s more, according to the report. Even with all this money being spent, a lot of the time is wasted. The coalition’s survey found that the total time wasted in pandemonium was as follows: 11th Lok Sabha,1996 to 1998: 5.28% of the time was wasted. 12th Lok Sabha, 1998 to 1999: 10.66% of the time was wasted. 13th Lok Sabha, 1999 to 2004: 22.40% of the time was wasted. 14th Lok Sabha, 2004 to 2006: 38.0% (More than 1/3 rd) was wasted in the first two sessions itself. Rajya Sabha—201st and 202nd sessions: 46% (almost half the time) was wasted. The numbers speak for themselves. Citizen posts in response: “I would perhaps adjust for inflation to make the numbers accurate, but the point about profligacy is quite accurate. The government needs to incentivise MPs to attend proceedings and curb crazy demonstrations.” “We need to introduce new metrics for our elected elite in the Parliament and allow a maximum limit for each speech (say 10 minutes). Any time, someone exceeds this, the speaker will assign negative brownie points—a part of his salary will be cut. And just as the media helped fight a public battle for the RTI, we need a similar effort to ensure no work, no pay.” “Debate/bhashan is what MP/MLAs are supposed to do. The report is accounting for average attendance and time lost due to disruption of parliament. It puts office-of-profit issues in focus, because many of them are engaged in moonlighting.” “I would love to believe there is a way of registering the opposition’s protest. What the Opposition wants to discuss, the government tries to downplay, thus agitating the Opposition. People have such a rigid stance on everything that sensible discussion looks as tough as talks between India-Pakistan peace talks.” —Excerpts from the Indian economy blog (indianeconomy.org) |
Reports from India
2018 - Achieving the SDGs: Rhetoric and reality
2016 - What does the 2030 Agenda mean to one-sixth of the world’s population?
2014 - Progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals 2015
2012 - Ill-founded growth leads to environmental disaster
2010 - Emerging trends in financing for development
2009 - Breaks in the road and missed milestones
2008 - Rights, commitments and delivery: who gets what, when and how?
2007 - Macroeconomic growth, challenging realities
2006 - Balancing goals, commitments and means
2005 - The accumulated effects of inequality
2003 - Erosion of rights and marketisation of development
2002 - Growth without development: rhetoric and deprivation
2001 - Withering of the welfare state
1996 - Productive employment and sustainable livelihood: The Indian Situation
A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
SUSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER