| 
 Why does Rwanda occupy such a high GEI position? Its surprisingly good performance is related to the recent implementation of affirmative action policies involving legally binding regulations, sometimes of a constitucional nature, designed to promote change in social factors, including structural ones. 
The following are examples of rapid changes that have taken place in this country over recent years: 
-  30% of decision-making related positions were assigned to women;
 
-  local funds and micro-credits were provided for production projects led by women; 
 
-  in 2003 Article 187 of the new Rwandan Constitution formalised equity promotion structures such as the National Council of Women;
 
-  a Gender Issues Monitoring Office was created, to facilitate the participation of women in public life and to ensure that development initiatives are egalitarian in generating benefits for both sexes.
 
 
As a result of these changes many women entered public life as political leaders. In the Chamber of Deputies seats held by women increased to 48.8%. There was also a significant increase in the participation of women at ministerial and local government levels. 
The most interesting conclusion to be made is that a high level of economic development is not necessary in order to implement effective gender inequity reduction measures. 
GEI Rwanda  
| 
 Empowerment 
 | 
 
| 
 Gaps 
 | 
 Professionals and Technicians Gap 
 | 
 Managers and Directors Gap 
 | 
 Parliamentarians Gap 
 | 
 Ministerial Gap 
 | 
 Empowerment gender gap 
 | 
 
| 
 2004 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 96 
 | 
 05 
 | 
 50 
 | 
 
| 
 2007 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 95 
 | 
 67 
 | 
 81 
 | 
 
 
  
| 
  Economic activity  
 | 
 
| 
 Gaps 
 | 
 Activity rate gap 
 | 
 Income gap 
 | 
 Economic activity gender    gap 
 | 
 
| 
 2004 
 | 
 88 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 88 
 | 
 
| 
 2007 
 | 
 95 
 | 
 74 
 | 
 85  
 | 
 
 
  
| 
 Education  
 | 
 
| 
 Gaps 
 | 
 Literacy gap 
 | 
 Primary enrolment gap 
 | 
 Secondary enrolment gap 
 | 
 Tertiary enrolment gap 
 | 
 Education gender gap 
 | 
 
| 
 2004  
 | 
 96 
 | 
 89 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 50 
 | 
 78 
 | 
 
| 
 2007 
 | 
 98 
 | 
 100 
 | 
 no data 
 | 
 62 
 | 
 87 
 | 
 
 
key measures and areas of action 
Social Watch Gender Equity Index 
Recent  GEI trends (2004-2007) 
GEI  values in 2007 
 |